| |
 |
 |
 |
|
International Clearinghouse for Hydrogen Commerce
www.hydrogencommerce.com
CONTACT |
 |
Hydrogen
and
National
Security
Part
1
2
The Case Against Imported Oil,
Coal,
Nuclear Power, OPEC, Imported LNG and their Lobbyists |
US, CANADA AND JAPAN
SELL OUT CLEAN FUTURE FOR ARAB OIL
|
"The Americans, Saudis
and Japanese have got what they wanted... It's worse than we could have imagined."
Steve Sawyer, climate policy director of Greenpeace
Earth
Summit Agrees Deal on Energy
Reuters/FT September
2, 2002
Hunter Lovins, an expert on industrial
efficiency whose clients include the Pentagon and big business, said the failure at a U.N.
summit of world leaders meant the planet would pay a high price to get to a sustainable
future, including more climate chaos and possibly wars over resources.
"I am ashamed of my government and now I am ashamed of the leaders
of all the world, with the exception of those countries that tried very hard to get those
targets," said Lovins, a 20-year veteran of the U.S. green movement.
...On Monday evening the European Union dropped its insistence
on setting the world's first targets to boost the use of renewable energy sources, in what
was widely viewed as a victory for the United States and OPEC oil-exporting states.
....Lovins said the energy chapter of the accord did nothing to stop
governments using taxpayers' money to subsidize conventional energy sources such as oil,
gas and nuclear at the expense of renewables like wind, solar and modern biomass.
Lovins, who estimates these subsidies at $200 billion, argued that the
world would now "pay twice" to clean up the damage she said these technologies
caused.
"We didn't have to do this the hard way. But now the world is
going to pay much of the money that could have been used for sustainable development to
forms of energy that are endangering life on the planet."
"This will lead to floods, famines and violent storms which will
force the world community to pay yet again to deal with those disasters which they caused
by paying those stupid subsidies in the first place," she said.
Top American
Green Ashamed of Summit Energy Deal
by William Maclean
Reuters September 3, 2002
To the outrage of
environmentalists, the U.S., Saudi Arabia and other nations at a U.N. summit worked
Tuesday to water down promises to rapidly expand the use of clean, renewable energy
technologies around the globe.
...Sources sitting in on the negotiations said the U.S., Saudi Arabia
and other oil states were among several nations whose delegates were lobbying to eliminate
specific goals to expand the use of renewable energy from the conference's implementation
plan.
"If renewable
energy is to grow and costs are to go down, it will need targets and frameworks."
Mark Moody-Stuart
former Shell Oil chairman , chairman of Business Action for Sustainable Development, an
advocacy group organized following the Rio Summit.
Clean Energy Tech Promises Watered
Down At UN Summit
by Joseph B. Verrengia AP August 27, 2002
AMERICA FOR SALE
...The Saudis have hired several
public relations firms and have already spent more than $5 million, according to new
Justice Department filings.
These firms include one of Washington's most prominent, Patton Boggs,
which received $170,000 in the first six months of this year, according to the filings.
Patton Boggs is especially known for its contacts among Democrats. It was founded by
Thomas Hale Boggs Jr., a well-connected Democratic lobbyist, whose father, Representative
Hale Boggs, was majority leader, and whose sister is the journalist Cokie Roberts.
The Saudi government has also hired Akin, Gump, Strauss, Hauer &
Feld, a firm founded by Robert W. Strauss, the former head of the Democratic National
Committee, paying out $161,799 in the first half of 2002, the filings show. Frederick
Dutton, a former special assistant to President John F. Kennedy and a longtime adviser to
the Saudis, received $536,000 to help manage the Saudis' handling of the aftermath of
Sept. 11 and he has a continuing contract with that government.
The Saudis have also turned to lobbyists with Republican credentials,
hiring James P. Gallagher, a former staff member for Senator Judd Gregg of New Hampshire,
and the media-buying firm of Sandler-Innocenzi, which has strong Republican connections.
Worried Saudis
Try to Improve Image in the U.S.
by Christopher Marquis New York Times August 29, 2002
Arab Oil Wealth Hits Highest
Level
ABQ Zawya August 29, 2002
"The Saudis are active at every
level of the terror chain, from planners to financiers, from cadre to foot-soldier, from
ideologist to cheerleader," stated the explosive briefing. It was presented on July
10 to the Defense Policy Board, a group of prominent intellectuals and former senior
officials that advises the Pentagon on defense policy.
"Saudi Arabia supports our enemies and attacks our allies,"
said the briefing prepared by Laurent Murawiec, a Rand Corp. analyst. A talking point
attached to the last of 24 briefing slides went even further, describing Saudi Arabia as
"the kernel of evil, the prime mover, the most dangerous opponent" in the Middle
East.
Briefing
Depicted Saudis as Enemies
by Thomas E. Ricks
Washington Post August 6,
2002
Saudi Arabia is teetering on the brink
of collapse, fuelling Foreign Office fears of an extremist takeover of one of the West's
key allies in the war on terror.
Saudi Arabia Could Fall to
al-Qaeda
by Martin Bright, Nick Pelham and Paul Harris
The Observer/Guardian (United Kingdom)
July 28, 2002
|
"Dependence on
foreign oilwhich bears heavily on the size of our military and greatly influences
our foreign policy could be sharply curtailed through the broad use of hydrogen
fuel cells."
Dr. Nirmal Chatterjee
VP, Environmental, Health and Safety and Corporate
Engineering
Air Products and Chemicals, Inc.
Hearing on the Reauthorization of the Office of
Pipeline Safety
Testimony of Dr. Nirmal
Chatterjee
before the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee
Subcommittee on Highways and Transit February 13, 2002 |
Saudi Arabia Could Fall to
al-Qaeda
by Martin Bright, Nick Pelham and Paul Harris
The Observer/Guardian (United Kingdom) July
28, 2002
Saudi Arabia is teetering on the brink
of collapse, fuelling Foreign Office fears of an extremist takeover of one of the West's
key allies in the war on terror. Anti-government demonstrations have swept the desert
kingdom in the past months in protest at the pro-American stance of the de facto ruler,
Prince Abdullah.
At the same time, Whitehall officials are concerned that Abdullah could
face a palace coup from elements within the royal family sympathetic to al-Qaeda.
more |
 |
West's Greed for
Oil Fuels Saddam
Fever
by Anthony Sampson
The Observer (UK)
August 11, 2002 |
Is the projected war against Iraq
really turning into an oil war, aimed at safeguarding Western energy supplies as much as
toppling a dangerous dictator and source of terrorism? more
|
Will U.S.
Foreign Policy
Be Held Hostage to Arab Oil? |
"If the
United States doesn't do more to reduce the violence, there will be grave consequences for
the US and its interests." |
Saudi
Dictator Abdullah May 1, 2002 Lloyd's List
While not an open threat to cut off Saudi crude supplies to
the West, a nervous oil market took the Crown Prince's ominous statement to mean just
that.
ARAB MEDIEVALIST'S MACHIAVELLIAN
STRATEGIES SUGGEST U.S. OIL EMBARGO;
RAISE DOUBT ON ARAB OIL STABILITY;
PROVIDE INCENTIVE FOR RENEWABLES
The US press corps pummeled Education
Minister Limor Livnat at a press conference at the Israeli Embassy in Washington on Monday
over the disclosure of documents showing Saudi Arabia funneled $135 million over the last
16 months to Hamas and the families of dead terrorists. Are you saying, one reporter
continuously asked Livnat, that Saudi Arabia is funding terror against Israel? Livnat
would not answer directly, saying only that the "facts speak for themselves."
Livnat Puts
Saudis on Defensive
Jerusalem Post May 8, 2002
In a bleak assessment on
Wednesday, the person close to the crown prince said there was talk within the Saudi royal
family and in Arab capitals of using the "oil weapon" against the United States,
and demanding that the United States leave strategic military bases in the region. Such
measures, he said, would be a "strategic debacle for the United States."
"The
last time the US made a concerted effort to improve energy efficiency between 1979
and 1985 GDP grew 16% while oil consumption fell 15%. Imports from the Persian Gulf
fell 87%. Had this trend continued, the US would no longer need Gulf oil.
"Unfortunately, President Ronald Reagans
roll-back of car and light-truck fuel-efficiency standards in 1986 soon caused imports
from the Gulf to double again. A few years later, the Gulf War cost the US more than it
would have cost to save all the oil imported from the Gulf.
"...The next big leap in energy will integrate
greater efficiency with a shift from hydrocarbons to hydrogen."
Amory Lovins, CEO,
Rocky Mountain Institute
Old Problems, New Solutions - Worldlink (UK) July 16, 2002
|
 |
"Use oil as a weapon in the battle with the enemy... The world
understands the language of economy, so why do not Arabs use this language?" |
|
Saddam
Hussein, dictator of Iraq and secretary general, Baath Party Reuters
Saddam Hussein, Iraq's president, called again Monday for fellow Arab producers to back
Baghdad's ban. He suggested that other nations cut output by 50 per cent with a complete
ban on sales to the US and Israel.
Financial Times
(UK) April 22, 2002
...The person close to Abdullah
pointed out that Saudi Arabia's recent assurances that it would use its surplus
oil-producing capacity to blunt the effects of Saddam Hussein's 30-day suspension of Iraqi
oil exports could quickly change. |
 |
If they do not receive oil
their factories will come to a halt.
This will shake the world " |
Ayatollah
Ali Khamenei, unelected dictator of Iran
AP BBC April 5, 2002
A possible Saudi-Iraq-Iran coalition to resist U.S. pressure -- even a temporary
one built out of necessity -- would entirely reshape regional politics and pose a
significant dilemma to the United States. ...Together they could bring greater political
and economic pressure to bear on the smaller Persian Gulf states, upon which Washington
grows increasingly reliant.
Saudis Desperate for Russian Help Stratfor
April 19, 2002 That Saudi pledge "was based on a
certain set of assumptions, but if you change the assumptions, all bets are off," he
said. |
 |
"If
other Islamic countries join in this call, it will be a very strong instrument
against America and Israel." |
Kamal Kharazi,
Iran's foreign minister
AP April 5, 2002
Iranian naval and air units will rehearse the seizure of the strategic Straits of Hormuz
and impose a mock blockade on Gulf oil shipping bound for Western and Japanese ports
through the Indian Ocean and the Mediterranean. They also will practice amphibious
landings on the islands of Abu Musa, Greater Tunb and Lesser Tunb in the mouth of Straits
of Hormuz.
Iran, Iraq, Syria, Hezbollah,
Palestinians Set to Initiate Attack
World Net Daily/Debka File (Israel) April 12, 2002
Iranian Oil Minister Stresses "Human Duty" of
Stopping Oil Supplies
BBC/IRNA News Agency (Iran) April 30, 2002 "We would no longer
say what Saddam said was an empty threat, because there come desperate times when you give
the unthinkable a chance."
Saudi to Warn Bush of Rupture
Over Israel Policy
by Patrick Tyler New York Times April
25, 2002 |
Energy After
September 11
A Commentary
by Seth Dunn
Worldwatch Institute
|
The tragic terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center and Pentagon, and the subsequent
military response, have raised thorny questions about U.S. energy policy. How does oil
import dependence factor into the U.S. military presence in Saudi Arabia -- a major
grievance of radical Islamic fundamentalists? How might continued heavy reliance on
imported Middle Eastern petroleum complicate American efforts to eradicate terrorism from
the region?
...Although the trend toward micropower and hydrogen was underway prior
to September 11, these events -- and the difficulties encountered in responding to them --
illustrate the consequences of not engaging in a more concerted public policy effort to
accelerate the introduction of these promising energy solutions. Indeed, they strengthen
the case for an Apollo-scale effort to develop an infrastructure for producing,
delivering, and using hydrogen. While there are costs in building a hydrogen economy, they
must be weighed against the risk of continuing to rely on oil imports from the Middle
East-which holds more than 65 percent of the world's proven petroleum reserves.
more |
|
"A
combination of a federal program for steadily increasing funding and active political
leadership would transform the clean energy sector from a good idea to a pillar of the new
economy. In particular, promising technologies such as fuel cells deserve special
attention. Fuel cell development is attracting significant public and private funding and
offers the promise of being a keystone technology for the ultimate transition from natural
gas, petroleum, and coal energy to a renewable and hydrogen based energy economy."
Daniel M. Kammen
Professor of Energy and Society, University of California, Berkeley
Director, Renewable and Appropriate Energy
Lab (RAEL)
Founding Director, Energy and Resoruces Group (ERG)
Letter to U.S.
Vice President Dick Cheney
February 16, 2001 |
The oil
states are often in the hands of rulers who are autocratic and corrupt. To Middle Eastern
allies like Saudi Arabia and Egypt we whisper that they need to change. They in turn snap
back that if we press for, and they effect, democracy too rapidly, the alternative might
be worse: extremist Islamic theocracies of the bin Laden ilk. We in turn murmur that if
they don't reform, the result may be extremist Islamic theocracies anyway.
And while this gentle dialogue goes on, the oil continues to be
pumped and to flow. The US, with only 5 percent of the world's population, guzzles 25
percent of the world's oil. Wouldn't US problems be solved then by Americans easing their
dependence on Middle Eastern oil, perhaps eliminating such dependence altogether? Ideally,
yes.
In this regard, the Bush administration took a significant step
last week with a plan to power the cars of the future with hydrogen-based fuel cells. Fuel
cells drawing hydrogen and oxygen from the air, if successfully developed, could
ultimately replace the internal combustion engine, thus sharply reducing US use of oil for
gasoline production.
Push More Vigorously for Mideast
Democracy
by John Hughes - Christian Science Monitor
January 16, 2002 |
"Although President Bush has made reduced dependence
on foreign oil a national priority, few people know that the U.S. owns only three percent
of the known oil reserves. This means we will never be able to supply all our own oil, and
this threatens our economic and national security."
Nancy Hazard, Director of the Tour de Sol
New Fuel-Efficient Cars Offer
National Security January
4, 2001
"A new generation of policymakers evidently believes that America's sole
energy security problem is imported oil, and that any domestic supply that can replace it
will improve energy security. In this sincere but misguided belief, Federal energy policy
continues to promote the most centralized, unforgiving, and vulnerable sources and
infrastructures, while ignoring or suppressing the more efficient, diverse, dispersed,
localized, and renewable options that could in time make major supply failures impossible
by design. At present, the Department of Energy, apparently unwittingly but quite
effectively, is undercutting the antiterrorist mission of the Department of Defense."
Amory and Hunter Lovins, Rocky Mountain Institute
Brittle Power: Energy
Strategy for National Security
Where Do We Go After ANWR?
"How casually people dismiss ANWRs value. Using the
USGS estimate of 10 billion barrels for the mean recoverable oil at ANWR, the current
value (@$30/barrel) is $30 x 10 billion = $300 billion or $300,000 million. Hardly an
insignificant amount. This could fund U.S. Social Security/Medicare for all Americans or
provide money to fight foreign wars for other nations oil fields." [emphasis CHBC]
The Oilman's Column #7
by L.F. Ivanhoe - Hubbert Center Newsletter 2001/2-1
Invading Other Countries to Seize Oil Fields Is An Energy
Policy?
Isn't There a Better Idea?
See Hydrogen
Politics |
The Wilderness Society Endorses Hydrogen Energy
September 28, 2000 U.S. Newswire |
Drilling in Alaska's
wilderness is not a sustainable substitute for a sound energy policy: The U.S. Geological
Survey estimates that oil recovered from the Arctic Refuge would amount to less than a six
month supply for American consumers. At no time would oil from the refuge be expected to
amount to more than about 2 percent of US demand. Plus, it would probably take 10 years
before any oil would make it to market.
The U.S. has at most 2-3 percent of the world's oil reserves while
accounting for 25 percent of the world's oil consumption. It is simply not possible to
produce our way to oil independence, even if we sacrifice all of our wilderness, parks,
refuges, and coastlines. |
| The only way out of our current dilemma and the only way for the
US to achieve energy independence is to invest in energy efficient new technologies,
become less reliant on oil, and embrace energy conservation, energy alternatives such as
hydrogen, and renewables such as wind and solar. |
| ...The benefits of an energy policy focused
on conservation and alternatives are not just environmental, but are also beneficial to
our national security, our economic competitiveness in the world, and our balance of
payments; we cannot afford to wait until the world runs out of oil to make this
transition. |
|
|
THE ICHC SHORT LIST
|

1)
The Riversimple Open Source Car Design
Are Our Designs Free?
Patrick's blog
40 Fires Foundation June 19, 2009
How does open source car design work?
The honest answer is that we won't know until we have done
it. But we have plenty of ideas, which will develop over the coming months
as we share the designs for the Riversimple technology demonstrator and
start to produce collaboratively a production prototype.
There are lots of inspiring examples from open source
software, and we are being advised by people with experience in this area.
But there are many differences between open source hardware and software
design.
Differences between open source hardware and software
There are some major differences between open source software
and hardware design:
- There is a "gap" between the on-line design work and the finished
product delivered to the consumer. Not only is there substantial physical
testing to be done, but also there is significant work to be done to turn
the designs into an actual functioning product (we like the analogy of a
food recipe – a recipe is not a meal, you need a chef to turn it into a
meal). The answer we believe lies in establishing the right relationship
between 40 Fires and the manufacturers (the first of which is Riversimple),
where each party has its needs met.
- There’s a technical challenge to share ideas on-line, where there is
no satisfactory open source CAD (Computer-Aided Design) application. Our
solution is to use a low tech approach at first, using a wiki-based
website and freely available 3-D viewers to show the 3-D drawings. In time
we may get involved in developing a OS CAD program.
- Licensing. We cannot simply take the standard OS software license
(the GPL is the most common), since we are dealing with hardware, which is
not so well protected by copyright. See further down for some thoughts on
the licensing issues.
We'd like to hear from you!
As in Open Source software projects, we are not attempting to
do everything at once and we don’t have to. The designs that Riversimple
is licensing to 40 Fires resemble in many ways the code base which a
complex software project starts with.
However, because a car is different to software and requires
different development stages and processes, we will be asking for input
into specific areas, as well as procedural matters.
That's why we would like to hear from you, not only from
engineers or designers, but also if you have contributed to large scale
open source software projects and can help set up our project management
structure. Lawyers with an understanding of copyright and patents would
also be useful as we review the most appropriate license to use and if and
how we should be using patents for some new inventions which emerge.
To get involved, send an e-mail to
participate@40fires.org explaining your interest and skills.
The stages
We envisage different stages:
Stage 1 Over the coming months, starting this month (July
2009), we will make available design schematics from the Riversimple
technology demonstrator vehicle, together with a description of each
component's function in the whole system, and a vehicle design brief for
the production prototype. We will provide a mailing list or discussion
forum to enable comments and discussions. At this stage we expect
Riversimple, as the creator of the original designs, to be leading the
discussions.
Stage 2 As the detailed discussions develop, we expect a
broad consensus to emerge amongst the participants as to which is the best
solution to pursue for each design . By this stage, we expect the
conversations to be more democratic, with a broad cross-section of
collaborators participate, sharing their knowledge and insights.
Stage 3 We start creating detailed designs collaboratively
and publishing them on-line. Eventually an entire vehicle will be created,
and tested, on-line. We are aiming to complete the design of the
production prototype by the summer of 2010.
Stage 4 Riversimple and other entrepreneurs, under license
from 40 Fires, can start downloading the schematics and building and
testing the vehicles. With the lessons from this, work can start on an
improved production prototype.
Are our designs free (as in beer)?
Richard Stallman famously said that free software is "free as
in speech not free as in beer."
Are our designs free?
We consider that the designs themselves will be free in the
sense of free speech, with one exception. Currently we have chosen a
Creative Commons, non-commercial license. So the designs can be used,
modified, distributed under the same license terms but not for commercial
purposes.
We have chosen to be conservative at this stage and not
allowed commercial use. This may change - we intend to set up a discussion
group to debate this. The issue is that we don't want a large,
profit-focused organisation taking the designs and starting manufacturing
with them yet. We intend that when we grant a manufacturing license, this
will be for a small fee (say $10 per car) to cover 40 Fires running costs.
We are also keen on collaborating so if a commercial
organisation wants to use the designs, we'd like to chat with them first
before allowing them to use the designs for commercial purposes.
The licensing issues are very complex (patent law is not
copyright law; cars are not software) and we don't pretend to have all the
answers. It is quite possible that our license may in the end not meet the
strict requirements of the Free Software Foundation. But all we really
care about is that the license works to ensure that the cars can be built
in hundreds of different variations around the world, by local companies
and entrepreneurs as well as big multinationals if they like, and that no
one company (whether Ford or Riversimple) can dominate the market and keep
the ideas to itself. |
| |